基于地理探测器的国家级非物质文化遗产的空间分布及影响因素研究
Analysis on the geographical spatial distribution pattern and influencing factors of the intangible cultural heritage in China based on geodetectors
-
摘要: 利用中国5批次共3610 项国家级非物质文化遗产(简称“非遗”)的空间分布数据集,基于地理学的视角利用地理探测器和地理空间分析等方法,对国家级非遗的空间分布格局及其影响因素进行探究。结果表明:(1)由中国非遗类型的集中化指数(0.253 6),可以看出非遗类型呈弱不均匀的结构分布;非遗数量总体呈阶梯状分布,以传统技艺、民俗、传统戏剧、传统美术和传统音乐为主,传统舞蹈、民间文学及曲艺次之,其他项目为稀缺。(2)国家级非遗空间分布的区域差异性较为明显,非遗总数的最邻近指数为0.479 9,在空间上呈现出明显的聚集分布特征;非遗数量整体呈现出东密西疏的地理空间分布格局,东部地区的国家级非遗数量明显高于中西部地区;全国非遗空间分布形成了2个高密度核心区、3个次密度核心区以及若干个相对独立的小核心区。(3)地理探测器探测分析结果表明:人文因素的影响最为显著,社会经济因素的影响次之,而自然因素的影响则相对最弱;但是当自然环境因素、人文因素和社会经济因素等三者之间进行交互作用时,这些因素对非遗地理空间分布的解释力显著增强。其中非遗代表性传承人人数、人口密度、交通条件和A级景点数是影响我国非遗分布的主要因素。Abstract: A spatial distribution dataset comprising 3610 national intangible cultural heritage items (abbreviated as “intangible heritage”) in China, encompassing five batches were utilized. From a geographical perspective, geographical detectors and geographical spatial analysis methods were employed to investigate and examine the spatial distribution pattern and influencing factors of national intangible heritage. The findings revealed that: (1) There was an uneven structural distribution of these types. The overall distribution of intangible heritage numbers followed a staircase pattern, primarily consisting of traditional crafts, folk customs, traditional opera, traditional art, and traditional music. It was followed by traditional dance, folk literature and quyi; whereas other projects exhibited sparse structures. (2) Regional disparities in the spatial distribution of national intangible heritage were relatively evident. The nearest neighbor index for intangible heritage numbers was 0.4799, indicating a clear aggregation feature in space. Overall, the distribution displayed an east⁃dense and west⁃sparse geographic pattern with significantly higher numbers of national intangible heritage items in the eastern region compared to the middle and western regions. A high⁃density core area along with three sub⁃density core areas had been formed nationwide in the spatial distribution of national intangible heritage alongside several relatively independent small core areas. (3) Results from geographic detectors indicated that human factors exerted the most significant influence on this phenomenon followed by social and economic factors while natural factors demonstrated comparatively weaker influence. However, when natural environmental factors interacted with human factors as well as social and economic factors, collectively explained their impact on geographic distributions.