西南民族地区贫困县旅游扶贫效率测度及时空分异研究

Tourism Poverty Alleviation Efficiency and Its Spatial-Temporal Differentiation in Poverty Counties of Southwest Ethnic Region

  • 摘要: 以广西28个国家级贫困县为例,运用三阶段DEA模型,选取2011、2015、2018年时间截面数据对28个贫困县旅游扶贫效率进行测度和评价.结果表明:(1)剔除干扰因素前后,旅游扶贫综合效率及其分解效率值差异显著,说明运用传统DEA模型测度旅游扶贫效率值会导致估计偏误.(2)调整后的2011、2015、2018年广西28个国贫县旅游扶贫综合效率呈现上涨态势,其均值依次是0.651、0.777、0.853.贫困县域间的纯技术效率差异较大,内部异质性突出.规模效率整体处于波动上升趋势,是少数民族地区旅游扶贫效率提高的主要驱动力.(3)28个国贫县旅游扶贫效率由“高散低聚”空间分布演化为“东西高西北低”特征,规模效率与旅游扶贫综合效率的演化相似,而纯技术效率空间演化与两者存在差异.(4)处于“双高型”旅游扶贫效率类型的县域数量最多,“双低型”次之,表明广西贫困县域旅游扶贫助力脱贫攻坚整体成效显著,但部分地区仍需要加大旅游产业要素投入和提高生产技术、管理水平.

     

    Abstract: Taking 28 state-level poverty-stricken counties in Guangxi as examples, three-stage DEA model is used to measure and evaluate the poverty alleviation efficiency of tourism in 28 poverty-stricken counties by selecting the time cross-section data of 2011, 2015 and 2018. The results show that: (1) Before and after removing the interference factors, there are significant differences in the comprehensive efficiency of poverty alleviation through tourism and its decomposition efficiency, which indicates that the measurement of poverty alleviation efficiency through tourism by using the traditional DEA model will lead to estimation errors. (2) After the adjustment, the comprehensive efficiency of tourism poverty alleviation in 28 counties in Guangxi showed an upward trend in 2011, 2015 and 2018, with an average of 0.651, 0.777 and 0.853, respectively. The differences of pure technical efficiency among poor counties are great, and the internal heterogeneity is prominent. The overall scale efficiency is fluctuating and rising, which is the main driving force for the improvement of tourism poverty alleviation efficiency in ethnic minority areas. (3) The spatial distribution of poverty alleviation efficiency of poverty-stricken counties in 28 countries changed from "high dispersion and low concentration" to "high in the east and west and low in the northwest". The evolution of scale efficiency and comprehensive efficiency of poverty alleviation by tourism was similar, while the spatial evolution of pure technical efficiency was different from both. (4) The number of counties with "double-high" tourism poverty alleviation efficiency is the largest, followed by "double-low" tourism poverty alleviation efficiency, which indicates that the overall effect of poverty alleviation assisted by tourism in poverty-stricken counties in Guangxi is remarkable, but some regions still need to increase the input of tourism industry elements and improve the production technology and management level.

     

/

返回文章
返回