考虑全寿命周期的地下工程开发适宜性评估方法研究

金立兵; 薛雅琪

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0972.2018.03.029

考虑全寿命周期的地下工程开发适宜性评估方法研究

河南工业大学土木建筑学院, 河南郑州 450001

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（51508162）；粮食公益性行业科研专项（201413007-01）

详细信息

作者简介:
金立兵(1976-),男,河南濮阳人,副教授,博士,主要从事混凝土结构与储仓结构研究.

中图分类号: TU924
计量
- 文章访问数: 814
- HTML全文浏览量: 46
- PDF下载量: 5
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-02-21
- 修回日期: 2018-04-16
- 发布日期: 2018-07-09

Suitability Evaluation Method of Underground Engineering Development Based on Life Cycle

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China

摘要

摘要: 合理开发利用地下工程是缓解地面交通压力、扩展空间结构、确保工程安全性与耐久性的重要途径，具有良好的发展潜力.从全寿命的角度出发，运用可变模糊集理论，建立了基于全寿命理论的可变模糊集评估方法，并运用工程实例对地面与地下工程对比分析，得出地下工程开发建设的优属度.结果表明：提出的地下工程开发适宜性评估方法能够对拟建地下工程的可行性进行有效评估，方法切实可行，也为类似地下工程的建设提供决策依据与新的评估思路.
- 地下工程 /
- 全寿命理论 /
- 可变模糊集理论 /
- 适宜性 /
- 评估
Abstract: The exploitation and utilization of underground space could effectively relieve the pressure of the ground traffic, extend space and ensure the safety and durability of engineering structures, which had good development potential.According to the theory of life cycle and variable fuzzy set, a new variable fuzzy set evaluation method based on life cycle theory was established. By using practical examples to compare the equivalent function of ground and underground engineering, the superiority of underground engineering development and construction was obtained. The results indicated that the proposed method was practicable, and could effectively evaluate the underground engineering, and provided decision-making basis and new assessment ideas for the construction of similar underground projects.
- underground engineering /
- life cycle theory /
- variable fuzzy sets theory /
- suitability /
- evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	HUNT D V L, MAKANA L O, JEFFERSON I, et al. Liveable cities and urban underground space[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2016, 55:8-20.
[2]	BOBYLEV N. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city's Master plan:A case of urban underground space use[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(4):1128-1137.
[3]	王建秀, 殷尧, 胡力绳. BIM及其在地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2017, 54(4):13-24. WANG Jianxiu, YIN Yao, HU Lisheng. Review of BIM and its application in underground engineering[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2017, 54(4):13-24.
[4]	陈丹, 冯东梅, 邵良杉. 采用AHP-可拓学的地下工程围岩稳定性预测模型[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2016(1):32-36.CHEN Dan, FENG Dongmei, SHAO Liangshan. AHP-extenics model for stability classification of underground engineering surrounding rock[J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Natural Science), 2016(1):32-36.
[5]	GOEL R K, DUBE A K. Status of underground space utilization and its potential in Delhi[J].Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1999, 14(3):349-354.
[6]	DELENBOS J, MONNIKHOF R, HAASNOOT J, et al. Strategic study on the utilization of underground space in the Netherlands[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1998,13(2):159-165.
[7]	ROBERTS D V. Sustainable development and the use of underground space[J].Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1996,11(4):383-390.
[8]	李录娟, 邹胜章. 综合指数法和模糊综合法在地下水质量评价中的对比:以遵义市为例[J].中国岩溶, 2014, 33(1):22-30. LI Lujuan, ZOU Shengzhang. Comparison of comprehensive index method and fuzzy comprehensive method in the evaluation of groundwater quality:A case study in Zunyi City[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2014, 33(1):22-30.
[9]	杨虹霞, 孙有仙. 事故树定性分析法在实际运用中存在的问题[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(9):203-206. YANG Hongxia, SUN Youxian. Problems of fault tree analysis in practical application[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011,7(9):203-206.
[10]	郭金玉, 张忠彬, 孙庆云. 层次分析法的研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(5):148-153. GUO Jinyu, ZHANG Zhongbin, SUN Qingyun. Study and applications of analytic hierarchy process[J].China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(5):148-153.
[11]	董建军, 陈光, 陆彦,等. 工程项目全寿命周期费用结构体系研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010(2):138-142.DONG Jianjun,CHEN Guang, LU Yan, et al. A study on project life-cycle cost structure system[J].China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010 (2):138-142.
[12]	王德华. 基于层次分析法的生态体育产品综合测度与评价[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 30(1):155-159. WANG Dehua.Comprehensive measurement and evaluation of ecological sports products based on the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 30(1):155-159.
[13]	陈守煜. 工程可变模糊集理论与模型:模糊水文水资源学数学基础[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2005, 45(2):308-312. CHEN Shouyu.Theory and model of engineering variable fuzzy set:Mathematical basis for fuzzy hydrology and water resources[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2005, 45(2):308-312.
[14]	孙宏才, 徐关尧, 田平. 用网络层次分析法(ANP)评估应急桥梁设计方案[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 27(3):63-70. SUN Hongcai,XU Guanyao,TIAN Ping.Design alternatives evaluation of emergency bridge by Applying Analytic Network Process(ANP)[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(3):63-70.
[15]	杨三超, 王丛莹. 绿色住宅小区评价指标体系的建立[J]. 建筑节能, 2012(3):66-69.YANG Sanchao,WANG Congying.Construction of evaluation index system for green residential quarters[J]. Building Energy Efficiency, 2012 (3):66-69.
[16]	郭一斌, 段永辉. 基于全寿命周期费用下的绿色储粮系统分析[J]. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 33(1):79-83.GUO Yibin,DUAN Yonghui.Analysis of green grain storage system based on life cycle cost[J].Journal of Henan University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 33(1):79-83.
[17]	石善冲, 王志英. 基于网络层次分析法的价值工程方案评价[J]. 九江学院学报(自然科学版), 2006, 21(1):107-110.SHI Shanchong,WANG Zhiying.The application of analytic network process in value engineering project evaluation[J]. Journal of Jiujiang University (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 21(1):107-110.
[18]	罗景峰, 许开立. 基于可变模糊优选理论的应急指挥决策[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2010, 20(7):147-150. LUO Jingfeng XU Kaili. Emergency command decision-making based on variable fuzzy optimization theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2010, 20(7):147-150.
[19]	邢玉巧. 地下粮仓全寿命周期经济性研究[D]. 郑州:河南工业大学, 2016.XING Yuqiao.Economy based-on research on life cycle cost of underground granary[D]. Zhengzhou:Henan University of Technology, 2016.